🔗 Share this article

This action from the Democratic National Committee to suppress the release of its internal autopsy report concerning the last presidential race seems stunning but entirely predictable. Opposed to frank assessments, the DNC often functions more like a PR firm rather than an electoral entity focused on building grassroots capacities to secure victories.

An Environment Resistant to Internal Critique

Reluctant to depart from the party establishment's culture of conformity, the committee has continued under the influence of the previous administration all through this past year. Releasing such a report would have indicated whether party leaders are interested to foster honest conversation about the missteps that paved the way for Donald Trump to become president again. Yet, the DNC is proceeding as if there is little to understand from the tragic debacle from the last cycle.

Our guiding principle: is this good for winning elections? If the answer is no, it is an unnecessary diversion from the core mission," a justification that has been offered to justify concealing the analysis.

Major Failures a Report Might Have Examined

An autopsy report with any value would confront key points of failure. These include:

• Electoral Disenchantment: Losing of millions of voters who supported the Democratic ticket during the previous election became a critical factor in the narrowly decided 2024 election.
• A Insistence to Run: The determined decision of a party leader to run again, and a last-minute exit, is seen by some as robbing the party's base of a genuine choice.
• Abandoning Everyday Americans: During a time of rising costs, the campaign reportedly bowing to corporate donors' interests without successfully attempting to address the effects of corporate greed.
• The Foreign Policy Factor: An unwillingness to reconsider an approach concerning a major international conflict allegedly caused alienating many voters, particularly among youth voters, Arab American communities, Muslim voters.
• Losing Young Voter Allegiance: Extensive evidence shows a huge decrease in support for the party among voters aged 18-29.

A History Avoiding Accountability

The decision to withhold fits a longstanding habit to avoid hard truths. This mirrors a situation in which virtually every elected Democrat in Congress supported an incumbent's decision for running for re-election until a disastrous televised debate forced a change.

Meanwhile, large majorities of Democratic voters were repeatedly informing researchers of their opposition to the incumbent to seek re-election.

Campaign Spending Issues

An honest autopsy would also probe issues about where money went, including how much money were directed to party strategists and advertising contractors over the course of an electoral effort that burned through a staggering sum during the general election.

The Underlying Issue

Fundamentally, the secrecy of the official autopsy is symptomatic of an allegiance to the established hierarchy who engineered a losing electoral effort. The signal to the party's base – including countless loyal volunteers – is that they cannot be trusted to see what party chiefs have learned from hundreds of interviews drawing from conversations with insiders.

An organization unwilling to critically review where it went wrong is unlikely to break free from the rut that proved so beneficial to the rival party.