🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of American men at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the three best players in the sport in succession. He is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an athlete is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed number four in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over No 3 the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive power on each front side and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club last four in July.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use far too much effort to win it. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has developed sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding virtually anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed determined a match, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely dwell on it forever if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {